Kurt's Thoughts

First of all, let me say that if you know anything about me, you know I have NOTHING to do with Microsoft’s Windows Vista Corporate Marketing or this giveaway.  I’m a Systems Engineer which is the technical sales arm of Microsoft’s field sales division

That being said, there’s been a ton of controversy over the fact that "Microsoft’s given away Ferrari’s to bloggers to evaluate Windows Vista Ultimate on."

• Some folks call it outright bribery
• Other folks call it fair marketing, and completely dependent on the blogger
• Yet others are whining, "Why didn’t I get a $2800 laptop?"  (No link provided to prote

Let me just say that I think product marketing’s ROFLing over all of this. 

IT’S ABOUT CREATING BUZZ
Would these bloggers all be talking about hardware requirements & Windows Vista had the laptops not gone out?  Would Windows Vista & Acer Ferrari laptops be the topic of TV shows like G4TV’s Attack of the Show and news magazines like CNet?  Would these bloggers, that are likely writing blog entries about their laptops, be getting the hits that they are and the trackbacks that have been generated had it not been for this giveaway stunt?  Highly doubtful. 

IT’S ABOUT MAKING APPLICATIONS AVAILABLE
This entire episode has been, at the very least, a fantastic way to create a lot of enduring buzz.  Why enduring?  Because for the folks that are keeping their laptops (and I’m sure that’s pretty much all of the recipients) they’ll all have the opportunity to use Windows Vista for the REAL reason the operating system is relevant:  THE NEXT-GEN APPLICATIONS.

• Applications that easily & readily communicate & integrate with online services
• Applications that leverage the power & motify of Windows Vista’s presentation system
• Applications the are empowered with OS level workflow
• Applications that are driven to leverage the power of 64-bit processing & memory spaces

I’ve said this before:  Most people have got it totally wrong.  As it stands right now, Windows Vista hasn’t come even close to realizing it’s full potential.  Windows Vista is about making possible

IT’S ABOUT COMMUNITY
Additionally, I know I’ve personally learned about several signficant blog sites out there simply on the basis of this whole "I received a Ferrari in the mail from Microsoft".  They’ve been all interconnected in a strange way as the "beknighted blog sites" by way of this laptop gift.  For example, here’s a few hot RSS feeds that have been recently added to my OPML list:

http://feeds.feedburner.com/SamGentile
http://istartedsomething.com/feed
http://www.mstechtoday.com/feed/
http://feeds.feedburner.com/zdnet/Bott
http://notgartner.wordpress.com/feed/
http://zen.heavengames.com/blog/xml/rss20/feed.xml
http://apcmag.com/blog/6/feed

NONE OF THIS IS NEW
And last but not least, anyone that thinks this method of marketing is new in anyway needs to get out a and see the world a little more.  It may be new to the these bloggers who happen to be very well exposed communicators, but it’s certainly not different from anything that hasn’t been going on in the world outside of computing:

• You don’t think Apple gives out iPods to celebrities?  Sony doesn’t give out Playstations to musicians?How about D&G sunglasses?  Breitling Watches?  Sidekick cell phones?  You don’t think it’s a remarkable coincidence that A-list celebrities all seem to use the same phones & media players?
• Women on the red carpet never buy their dresses or clutch purses just as men never pay for this tuxedos.  They never mention that they get their garments and accessories for free because, frankly, it’s assumed.
• Why doesn’t anyone complain about Apple giving computers away to everyone and anyone:  For those not aware, Apple’s got a monster seeding budget for their hardware and product placement in not just media outlets but influential end users.

So if anyone has a problem with all of this, maybe they should consider advocating balance.  Apple already sends Mac laptops to reviewers – just not in such a formal, orchestrated way like Microsoft has.  Maybe Suse Linux should send laptops to people they want people to use their product.

OUCH!  Check this article out from from Dana Jongewaard, former managing editor of the Official Playstation Magazine:

Why I am buying a 360 this November
"…So ultimately, I can’t justify it. $600 is a lot of money, especially when I can get what–for me at least–will be a very similar experience for $400. I would like to own a PS3, and I hope that the price drops soon so I can consider it. But until then, this Official PlayStation Magazine editor will have to join the dark side."
http://www.1up.com/do/blogEntry?bId=7344653&publicUserId=5380375

Oh, and while I don’t disparage anyone trying to make a buck these days, I find myself laughing at those inexperienced resellers assuming they’d make $1000s of dollars by reselling PS3’s at ridiculous prices.  Here’s a bit of karma for you:

Scalpers returning PS3s to stores
Eager entrepreneurs trying to make a fast buck on hot demand for the new Sony PlayStation 3 this holiday season have found themselves out of luck.
The initial supply of PlayStation 3 game consoles fell well short of demand and spawned a market of scalpers who picked up the systems.
But a last-minute surge in supply to electronics retailers has left many holding a PS3 with nowhere to unload them.
http://www.hamiltonspectator.com/NASApp/cs/ContentServer?pagename=hamilton/Layout/Article_Type1&c=Article&cid=1166827812677&call_pageid=1020420665036&col=1014656511815

Still not believing it?  Take a look at the date:  It’s 12/29/2006.  Now take a look at the going rate for Playstation 3’s on eBay:
http://video-games.listings.ebay.com/_Systems_Sony-Playstation-3_W0QQa14Z43932QQalistZa14QQcatrefZC6QQcurcatZtrueQQfcclZ1QQfclZ4QQfgtpZQQfposZ94710QQfromZR2QQfsooZ1QQfsopZ1QQftZ1QQftrtZ1QQftrvZ7QQgcsZ1134QQlopgZQQpfidZ1412QQpfmodeZ2QQpriceZ1QQsacatZ62054QQsadisZ200QQsapplZ1QQsaprchiZQQsaprcloZ400QQsaslcZ2QQsatitleZQQsbrftogZ1QQsocmdZListingItemListQQsofocusZso

800,000 UCLA alumni identities, including their social security numbers, were compromised a few weeks ago by a hacker who was specifically targetting people’s identity information.  From what I can tell, a lot (if not all) of the people that were on this list were contributors/donaters to UCLA’s alumni association.  Note that a similar hack was successful at USC which affected 200,000 identities, i.e. this is not an isolated incident.

This is a threat & intrusion on people’s personal privacy that rivals very few other crimes.  I hope they find this guy and prosecute him to the maximum extent allowable by law.  Identity thieves are some of the lowest forms of life on the planet.

The full news story is here:
http://newsroom.ucla.edu/page.asp?RelNum=7571

Information about "what to do" is available here:
http://www.identityalert.ucla.edu

I read that people can call (877) 533-8082 to find out if they were on the list of compromised identities and that those that find they are on the list can call 888-397-3742 at Experian (or visit the web site at http://www.experian.com/fraud) to place a Fraud Alert on their credit report, which will be replicated/shared with Equifax & Transunion, the other two credit agencies.

In the spirit of Christmas and sharing, here’s something I encountered during a internal Microsoft discussion:

Get to a high level, and get the Galagoogoo, (http://pinataisland.info/index.php?title=Galagoogoo) you might instantly get this achievement:

In that same vein, there’s also this ol’ Penny Arcade comic:
(For the record, my wife plays Mortal Kombat: Deception with me on Xbox )

(My apologies to Penny Arcade for republishing their content but I don’t know what the damned link is for the same comic on their site.  If I figure it out, I’ll post it.) 

WOW.  There’s just too much news coming in to write entries about each one so here’s a summary of some of the amazing news coming in on Xbox 360:

GEARS = FASTEST SELLING GAME EVER
You read that right:  Gears of War is the fastest selling game ever on any console, period.

SUDDENLY SELLING IN JAPAN
Xbox 360’s media reported death in Japan appears to be greatly exaggerated.  Japanese sales are up a whopping 770%. 35,000 consoles sold in a month, up 31,000 from the previous month.  This is lower than PS3 at 50,000 consoles sold, and Wii at 85,000 sold but it’s sure as hell ain’t dead.  The fact that there are people giving Xbox 360 a chance is huge, and judging by the quality of the Japanese exclusive titles, rightfully so.  Japanese Xbox 360 titles like "Blue Dragon" have propelled Xbox 360 into striking range of PS3 on it’s home turf.

THE BLUE DRAGON EFFECT
What’s "Blue Dragon"?  Only the #4 selling video game in Japan.  Its characters were designed by Akira Toriyama, the artist behind Dragonball Z and the game was designed by Hironobu Sakaguchi, the creator of Final Fantasy.  And it’s gotten great reviews from sites like CVG.  How relevant is all of this?  Try this on for size: Blue Dragon is outselling Nintendo’s flagship title, "Zelda: Twilight Princess" – and all other Nintendo Wii software – in Japan. 

SONY LOSING EXCLUSIVES
First, Sony lost Final Fantasy to XBox 360.  Then it was Assasin’s Creed.  Then the big bomb dropped and Grand Theft Auto 4 was announced as a XBox 360 title as well.
And now, it sounds like Sony’s losing it’s iron fisted grip on Metal Gear Solid 4 to XBox 360.
http://www.joystiq.com/2006/12/17/heightened-rumor-metal-gear-solid-4-not-a-ps3-exclusive/

First of all, Merry Christmas everyone.

THE QUEST TO MANAGE MY PARENT’S HOME PC
My Mom has a 256MB Celeron-based PC with an 80GB drive and firewalled Windows XP SP2.  It’s behind a NAT-ted Router that connects to a PPPoE DSL connection, meaning the DSL IP address is always different – not unlike a cable Internet connection – and her PC is issued a 192.168.x.x address.   She has problems with it slowing down and a while ago, she even had spyware issues.  There is also a laptop PC(Dad’s) that has the same situation.

In the past, I’ve remotely controlled her PC but only after painfully walking her through the process of sending me a "Remote Assistance" invite.  (Incidentally, that was NOT a well thought out technology in Windows XP.  Who the @#$% ever thought computer-illiterate parents around the world would know how to "send Remote Assistance requests" to their offspring when their computer was having trouble?  Ridiculous.)  This was always done using Remote Desktop technology which is actually a very well optimized protocol good however the facilities to connect to the remote workstation have been lacking at best.

So the question is: 

How does a person easily & quickly "remote control" their parent’s computer?

EXISTING REVIEWS?
I did some research and frankly, to my surprise, not a lot has written on this specific scenario.  Sure folks have written about "remote controlling" someone else’s over the Internet PC, but the assumptions made have always been that:

• the person’s computer is a small business that can afford something relatively costly
• the person’s PC isn’t NAT-ted (using a translated 192.168.x.x address)
• the person’s PC is the ONLY PC to be managed behind the NAT
• the end user is a customer, not a family member
• the people putting the solution together didn’t mind installing, tweaking & configuring a ton of helper software

SOLUTIONS
I found a ridiculous array of tools and services and after culling through them and Windows Live search results, I’d examined several products:

• GoToMyPC
• MyWebExPC 
• Laplink Everywhere
• I’m In Touch
• UltraVNC
• Symantec PC Anywhere
• Dameware
• LogMeIn Free
• …and about a dozen others not worth mentioning…

My evaluation criteria was pretty simple.  It’s all the information above:  Assuming a broadband connection on both ends, I need basic high performance Windows-to-Windows remote control over multiple PCs behind a NAT using a DHCP assigned router and I need to be able to access the machine any time of the day without my parents involvement.

THE VERDICT
I’m not going to bore you with all my analysis.  After looking at all the products & services, it became readily obvious to me what solution works best for my parents:  There’s no question that LogMeIn Free wins hands down for this particular scenario, although it’s conceivable that GoToMyPC and maaaaaaaaaybe UltraVNC could be useful in other situations.

1. NAT-SUPPORTED.  This is where most desktop-only software fails.  LogMeIn gets around the issue of having a NAT by registering itself with an online directory, and basically keeping a HTTP connection open all the time with the service, providing a "tunnel" to the DHCP-enabled router, through the NAT, and into the PC to be remote controlled.  This connection allows other PC’s to externally converse with the PC since a communicatins path has already been established between the service & the home PC.  No modifications need to be made to the router and nothing fancy needs to be installed on my PC.
   To be fair, UltraVNC does this exact thing however their facilities are entirely, "do-it-yourself".  If you’ve got the time and the will, you could actually set up a poor man’s version of this yourself through UltraVNC’s NAT-to-NAT Helper service.  But considering bullet #3 below… why bother?
2. SECURE & CORPORATE-SUPPORTED.  This is where UltraVNC gets questionable.  LogMeIn Free software is proprietary, fully SSL-encrypted and supported by a corporation registered with the US government.  I’m not interested in using questionable freeware leveraging open source code written in some guy’s basement that might potentially expose my parents to privacy threats & intrusions.  I want a legally established company that stands behind their products and understands the legal consequences of their software’s integrity – or lack thereof.
3. FREE.  And this is where GoToMyPC fails.  LogMeIn "Free" software & service is totally free.  The only thing you don’t get in the "free" version vs. the "Pro" version is direct PC-to-PC file transfer capabilities, and frankly, if you have Internet-based storage, it’s just as easy to transfer what you need between each PC through that resource.  Note that I’m not a leech:  I’m actually pleased enough with the software that I’m going to subscribe to it for my parent’s PC… at $49 a year, that’s worth having the pay-for product in my mind.  (Although, if I get some love from the Citrix folks and get a partner discount, I’ll probably switch over to GoToMyPC.com which is frankly a much more full-featured product with richer features than LogMeIn doesn’t have and it DOESN’T REQUIRE JAVA.  It is however the most expensive technology in this genera at $249/year.

HOW TO USE "LOGMEIN FREE"

1) Create an account:
https://secure.logmein.com/welcome/get_logmein_free/signup.asp
2) Download software & add a computer to your account:
https://secure.logmein.com/go.asp?page=products_free
(You can also download the installer separately here:  https://secure.logmein.com/logmein.msi)
3) Sign in from any computer to remote control the machine:
https://secure.logmein.com/go.asp?page=home
(Note that you need to have a JavaVM installed on the machine doing the controlling which sucks because Java’s slow relative to Native Win32 binaries, and besides, it’s one more thing that you need to keep patched.  This is one of the reasons I actually prefer the ridiculously more expensive GoToMyPC and its Win32 client for remote control.)

DISCOUNTS
Check this out:  I found this discount on line for the LogMeIn Pro product, which is a $20 discount off the annual subscription to Logmein.com.  Use the code:  JHZH-YXVL and you’ll find the cost go from $69.95/year down to $49.95/year.

A FINAL NOTE ON WINDOWS XP’S REMOTE DESKTOP
I’m a KoolAid drinker and I’m the first to try Microsoft’s own software.  But before anyone starts howling about using Remote Desktop over LogMeIn Free, recall that I need to support multiple computers behind the router.  Even if I were to configure port forwarding for port 3389 (RDP’s port) on the router, which I don’t really want to do, I would only be able to do this for one PC.  There’s an article on how to accomplish this if you want to set it up here.  (http://www.networkgarage.com/2006/04/cancel_your_gotomypc_subscript.html)

Incidentally,  pay no attention to the comments list to the folks screaming that RDP is insecure:  The protocol used to remotely control a Windows PC using the Remote Desktop Client 6.0 is not only encrypted using RC4, it’s also quite secure.  Be sure to be using the most recent remote desktop client software here, use WinXP SP2, and for good measure, upgrade to Windows Vista. 

In the interests of honesty, technically there is a very small threat of what is called a "man-in-the-middle" attack on WinXP systems using RDP 5.2, however let’s be clear… man-in-the-middle attacks are extremely rare and very difficult to accomplish and there are few people in the world with the technical sophistication to execute them.  It accounts for something like "less than 1000th of a percent of all intrusion attacks made" because of their difficulty and requirements to execute and would require invasively corrupting the routing cache on your personal workstation or setting up a rogue DNS server on your ISP or something really extreme to target just you specifically.

To give you an idea of the sophistication we’re talking about, this hacking technique is usually reserved for attacking eCommerce sites like eBay & financial institutions like Bank of America to intercept credit cards & passwords.  If someone is in fact truly attempting to use this technique against you and your computer, it’s not random:  You or your organization is probably important enough (or rich enough) that skimping paying $50/year for LogMeIn Pro, $200/year for GoToMyPC, or whatever support service you might otherwise be using isn’t exactly your first priority.  Remember:  This is your Mom we’re talking about… not freakin’ Bill Gates.

Flipping through CNN, I stumbled upon this:

10 stocks to buy now
With oil prices and a housing bust threatening the economy, we discovered ten solid stocks that can still pack a punch:

Microsoft (MSFT)
Don Yacktman, another recent buyer, points out that the company has returned more than $90 billion to shareholders in stock buybacks and dividends over the past few years, a trend he says will continue. Says Yacktman: "Despite selling at one of the lowest price/earnings multiples in our portfolio, Microsoft possesses potentially the strongest platform for growth of any company we own."
http://money.cnn.com/popups/2006/fortune/invguide_stocks/7.html

Internally, a bunch of us are talking about this hilarious review of our beloved game for the Xbox 360, "Viva Pinata":

The Evils of Viva Piñata
<excerpt>
"They have no genitalia, yet they can breed. How is that possible and how do we know we aren’t breeding boy piñatas together? You see how sick and twisted this game is. The people at Microsoft are trying to warp the minds of our children with their evil gay, incestuous piñata sex. Next thing you know, your children will be humping the piñata at their next birthday party, instead of breaking it open. God, I hate to imagine how warped our children could end up from all this.

The weird sex isn’t the only thing going on it the game though. Getting back to the racist nature of the game, you have all these obvious Mexican people on the island and what pray tell does Microsoft have you doing to the Mexican people? They have you hiring them to do gardening. "
</excerpt>
http://www.destructoid.com/the-evils-of-viva-pinata-28577.phtml#ext

I was laughing hard enough that for the first time in a while, I was left speechless as to how to respond to such irreverence.  I honestly don’t know what to say, except I love you guys at Destructoid.  I really do.  You’re right up there with Ctrl-Alt-Del Online & Penny Arcade and for me, that’s high praise.

"…as a developer who is watching the online gaming realm with particular interest, Jones also has plenty of love to express for Microsoft’s online service, which Crackdown will utilize in a few ways. “I think [Xbox Live] is absolutely brilliant,” he opined. “It’s really the defining thing for Microsoft. … One of the reasons we got the investment is so that we could try some new things in the Live space—using the Marketplace, downloadable stuff. It’s just great for all the stuff you can do—the big games, the very small ones. There’s just potential for other things as well.”

On PS3 and Wii
So what’s with Realtime Worlds and all this Xbox 360 development? Does Jones have something against the PlayStation 3 and Wii? Nah.

“I’ve only seen [the PS3 and Wii] at shows,” he explained. “I find it as hard as anyone else to get a hold of one, especially in Europe. … It’s a shame that I haven’t had a chance to spend much time on them yet.”

He continued, “We’ve been really focused. We’re only doing two projects at a time, so we’re focused on APB on PC and Crackdown on 360. We really haven’t had a chance to look at [other] dev kits.”

LINK:  http://www.next-gen.biz/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=4363&Itemid=2

PlayStation 3 Misses U.S. Sales Goal by 50 Percent
Bloomberg News – December 07, 2006

Sony sold 197,000 PlayStation 3 consoles in the U.S. during November, missing its goal for initial shipments by half after parts shortages slowed production, market researcher NPD Group said Thursday.

http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&sid=a2AoBmhG5OEw&refer=home

I’ve been watching with great amusement the wars going on at these sites.  They really are interesting.

BluRay vs HD-DVD
http://www.thedvdwars.com/index.cfm
http://www.betanews.com/article//1165432567#c514148
http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20061207-8378.html

Why HD-DVD?  It’s more than just the "picture quality":
Despite the babbling idiocy of your average BestBuy or Circuit City employee, HD-DVD is beating BluRay in picture quality hands down and the critics are confirming this.  All you have to do is search for reviews comparing the two, and you’ll find this to be a truth:

• HD DVD and Blu-ray Compared Using Identical Source Material
  http://gizmodo.com/gadgets/home-entertainment/hd-dvd-and-bluray-compared-using-identical-source-material-192100.php
• Initial Notes on Samsung’s Blu-ray DVD Player
  http://www.projectorcentral.com/blu-ray_initialreport.htm
• Blu-ray versus HD DVD: First Head-to-Head Comparisons
  http://www.highdefdigest.com/feature_blurayvshddvd_firstcomparison.html

But did you know that HD-DVDs have FARRRRRRRRR more "DVD extras" than any BluRay title?  I’m really surprised that no one has ever brought this up.  One of the little known facts in this space is that HD DVD uses HDi™ to build some amazingly cool additional content & interfaces around the DVD extras that people oh-so-covet. 

For example, you get Picture in Picture (impossible on Blu Ray) in HD-DVD movies.  This is useful for things like Director’s commentary head shots, showing GPS mapping for the cars in Fast & the Furious Tokyo Drift, Selectable actor biographies during the movie, Design-your-own-car and see it in the movie in Tokyo Drift, Chocolate Vision (suitably bizarre Tim Burtonesque pop ups) in Charlie & the Chocolate Factory, the "DaisyOmeter" in Dukes of Hazzard.

Check out the amazing HD-DVD extras in Fast and the Furious – Tokyo Drift, King Kong, Miami Vice, Batman Begins, Constantine, Charlie and the Chocolate Factory, Dukes of Hazzard, etc.

If you have a HDTV incapable of projecting 720p – only 480i/p, 1080i – which is pretty much the majority of HDTV buyers out there, Sony Playstation 3 games look like utter crap.  The video is rendered in memory in 720p but since your monitor can’t do 720p, it downgrades the video quality to 480p and sends it out the component cables where your TV upscales the video to 1080i.

Sony, with their typical arrogance, muttered something about people having "outdated" TVs.  What?  Try telling that to a guy who bought a Mitsubishi Diamond DLP Projection 75" Big Screen HDTV for $10,000, and that’s before the 5:1 Bose Surround sound system. 

To quote my friend, "F-ck you very much, Sony."

To recify the problem, some product manager blurted out that they’d be somehow patching the Sony Playstation 3 with a firmware upgrade to allow the Sony Playstation 3 to upscale video from 720p to 1080i in memory before it gets sent to the component out.  I read this and I said to myself, "They’re gonna do this, real-time, in software?  No dedicated hardware or chips to rapidly convert the content?  Seriously?" 

As I understand it, the Xbox 360 renders most games in memory at 720p then uses HARDWARE (chips) to upscale the video to 1080i/p in real time so there’s no latency.  So to anticipate that the box will do this in software is pretty questionable.  Yeah, yeah, yeah… they’ve got the glorious Cell processors and all that jazz but again, for one of these processor to do the job of something a specialized chip does on the Xbox 360… is highly unlikely.

Then this came out.

SCEA Comments on PS3 Resolution on Older HDTVs
Sony has contacted us to let us know that they may have spoken a bit prematurely. SCEA’s Dave Karraker, Sr. Director, Corporate Communications, informed GameDaily BIZ that they currently cannot confirm that this 1080i issue will be resolved via a firmware patch. The official line is now that they are "looking into the issue and haven’t stated any actions that will be taken regarding it."
http://biz.gamedaily.com/industry/news/?id=14518

To me, this close to the other shoe dropping.  Having to hedge your bets through a statement to the public and saying that, "we’re not sure that we’re going to have a solution that will allow you to upgrade your existing purchase," creates doubt in the mind of consumers.  The fact that they’re willing to risk this tells me that:

1. They really aren’t sure they can do this or if it’ll work.
2. They are hoping this will somehow wash over wihle people still clamor to get a PS3.

How much do you want to bet that they never get this problem solved… until they start shipping new consoles with the issue fixed in hardware?

I don’t even need to write anything.  Penny Arcade has already done it for me:

Note above the Xbox360 in hand along with the copy of Gears of War
Taken from http://www.penny-arcade.com/comic/2006/11/17

And I quote:

"The launch is full of…  well, Launch Titles.  It sounds like Insomniac did what Insomniac does – deliver spit-polished hits. Past that, you’ve got Genji (rank), Untold Legends (just… no) and Gundam (daemonic). Everything else is something that: 
(a) already came out, and
(b) most likely runs better or has more features on existing equipment.  Seriously, read the reviews.  
…this is beyond insulting. This is beyond ridiculous.  It is farcical."

Read the full commentary here:  http://www.penny-arcade.com/2006/11/17

UPDATE 11/22/2006:
This has officially turned into madness. 

I want to be clear about something here.  This is NOT a commentary on greed or responsibility on Sony’s part.  I don’t believe that people’s wanton desire for the console is a bad thing at all and I don’t think that Sony did anything wrong is releasing it’s console with such a limited supply.  That’s their prerogative.

This is a commentary about:

1. The horrendous PR job their company has done and
2. The ridiculous lawlessness and lack of civil order that is occuring throughout the world 

ATTENTION LAW ENFORCEMENT & STORE OWNERS:  There are idiots everywhere that are going to cause trouble.  You know that chaos is a possibility.  You know that this spectacle is something that brings you patrons and is essentially free advertising for your stores… why aren’t you better prepared?

• PS3 campers shot outside Kentucky Best Buy
  http://www.joystiq.com/2006/11/16/ps3-campers-shot-outside-kentucky-best-buy/
• Person shot in Playstation waiting line
  http://www.newsday.com/news/local/wire/connecticut/ny-bc-ct–putnamshooting1117nov17,0,833783.story?coll=ny-region-apconnecticut
• Armed Gunmen Steal PS3 Consoles in Elk Grove Store Robbery
  http://www.news10.net/display_story.aspx?storyid=21616
• Violence escalates during PS3 launch
  http://www.joystiq.com/2006/11/17/violence-escalates-during-ps3-launch/

—————–
ORIGINAL POST:
It’s interesting to see there’s another big brand out there with really, questionable PR.  Seriously Sony… who’s responsible for your press relations?  I never thought I’d see the day where another tech firm’s PR department was twice.. no, check that… THREE TIMES as bad as ours.  At least we have the excuse of being a monster company with PR concerns all over the board:  Sony only has this one product that’s coming to market now that they have to concentrate on, and they’re handling it with all the grace of a bull in a china shop.

Next to Sony, Microsoft PR is 24k gold.

• NY Times: The PS3 "isn’t that great"
  "Measured in megaflops, gigabytes and other technical benchmarks, the PlayStation 3 is certainly the world’s most powerful game console. It falls far short, however, of providing the world’s most engaging overall entertainment experience. There is a big difference, and Sony seems to have confused one for the other."
  http://www.joystiq.com/2006/11/20/ny-times-the-ps3-isnt-that-great/
  
• Boston’s mayor says Sony’s launch wicked wrong
  "Sony’s PlayStation 3 finally launched last week, but as predicted, supplies were extremely limited. Many stores received only a few units, and in some places, long lines combined with inconsistent preordering standards led to some very unhappy gamers. In some places, this anger led to violence. Now, Boston mayor Thomas Menino is planning to send Sony a bill for an incident that happened at Copley Plaza’s Sony Style store."
  http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20061119-8249.html
  
• Analyst: PS3s to be in even shorter supply
  "An analyst claims that Sony’s projections for the North American launch may be too optimistic. Sony had announced that the PS3 launch would see North America receive 400,000 machines. However, according to Lazard Capital Markets analyst Colin Sebastian, Sony will only be able to deliver 150,000 to 200,000 consoles to the US market at launch, approximately half the number the company has predicted. (Sony’s estimates are for all of North America, and Sebastian’s figures are for the US only, so the figures may not be quite as bad as they first appear.)"
  http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20061115-8233.html
  
• Sony taking big hit on each PS3 sold; Xbox 360 in the black
  "Market research firm iSuppli has torn down the PlayStation 3 to see what’s inside. In doing so, iSuppli confirmed what we reported back in February: the PS3 is expensive to manufacture and Sony is taking a serious hit on each console sold."
  http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20061116-8239.html
  
• PlayStation 3 launches in US to huge demand
  "If you listen to reports on the PlayStation 3 launch in the major media and on other websites you get a grisly picture: people are getting robbed and shot at, are rioting inside Wal-Marts, and of course each store is only getting a few systems."
  http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20061117-8242.html
  
• Hot 360 titles and PS3 problems exposed
  "Sony has had a few problems since the PS3’s release last week.
  Backwards compatibility was never Microsoft’s strong-point with the 360, and the new Playstation is suffering similar problems.
  "We are trying to get there as quickly as possible," said SCEA President and Chief Executive Kaz Hirai. Spokespeople from Sony said the issues were mostly related to audio glitches and Playstation 3 controller mappings which may not exactly correspond with what the developer intended with the original controllers."
  http://www.theinquirer.net/default.aspx?article=35838

UPDATE:  6:02PM
ENGADGET:  More information on PS3’s inability to upscale to 1080i.
http://www.engadgethd.com/2006/11/16/ps3-doesnt-do-1080i/

CNET:  Holy crap! CNet says it also does not upscale DVDs. So it appears one can definitively say that the PS3 has no upscaling capability, period — it can’t upscale 720p games to 1080i, and can’t upscale DVDs at all.  http://reviews.cnet.com/Sony_PlayStation_3_60GB/4505-6464_7-31355103.html

———-
ORIGINAL POST:
I’m shocked at this.  It would appear that this is true from various discussions I’ve read although we have yet to hear from Sony on the topic: 

"PS3 won’t internally upscale game visuals to 1080i." 
(Translation:  If you lack 720p, you’re screwed because it’ll downconvert all your game visuals to 480p quality which is what will be displayed on your TV regardless of what resolution you have available and thus your expensive 1080i TV investment is useless.)

What Sony’s doing is frankly bizarre.  They assumed that everyone in the world owns a 720p capable HDTV set, which is asinine considering up until 2005 it was very rare to find HDTVs that supported anything except 480i, 480p, & 1080i. (Notice the lack of 720p in that list)  I fall into this category with my 65" Mitsubishi Big Screen HDTV.  I mean, just think about it:  People that spent $10,000 on their TV sets between 2001 and mid 2005 – a significant investment mind you – will get horrific picture quality because they can’t get anything other than 480p out of a PS3 on their TVs.

This isn’t a "small number of people" either.  Every Audio/Video enthusiast I know has TVs that they purchased back in 2005 or before – particularly DirecTV owners that I know that all loved the digital quality they were able to enjoy on their big screens, regardless of whether it was 480p or 1080i.

Basically, it would appear that if you don’t have 720p capability on your set:

1) The PS3 takes its games and within its hardware, downscales the visual to 480p.  Most if not all PS3 games are designed for 720p rendering and if you don’t have 720p, the PS3 hardware won’t upscale the video to 1080i/p.

2) The PS3 then sends the 480i/p content to the TV which then upscales the video image to 1080i, which of course always looks awful.

The net-net:

"If you don’t have a TV with 720p output capability i.e. a TV purchased within the last year, and you want 1080 resolution – don’t buy a Playstation 3."

—————————
ORIGINAL ARTICLE:  http://www.dailytech.com/article.aspx?newsid=4971

Penny Arcade did a comic that shows very simply why I treat Wikipedia as nothing more than a online graffiti site.  It’s heralded by flower-power-kumbaya-let’s-all-get-together-and-join-hands community activists as the ultimate collaborative "worksite" for keeping the collective knowledge stored through the cummulative efforts of many, many people.  The idea is that everyone can contribute & edit, everyone has the same rights, no one gets rejected, content is monitored by a higher authority, and in the end, the correct content will "win out" after all is said and done.

This of course had another name a couple decades ago:  Communism. 

And it didn’t work out so well for the Soviet Union for the same reasons that Wikipedia doesn’t either.  (Yes, yes… I know the Soviets didn’t actually have "true" communism but that was the original intent) It’s a nice altrusitic idea I suppose but in practice communism failed because it relied on the premise that everyone’s focus was on what was best for society as a whole and that no one individual had their own agenda.  It empowered the government, which did have their own agenda, with dictatorial oversight which created what we now know as "fascism".

The "Good Intentions" Encyclopedia
Same goes for Wikipedia.  Everyone gets a say and at any given moment, that "say" is considered by the current reader as gospel.  Why?  Wikipedia, as an information source, positions itself that way.  It of course never declares that its content is accurate but the mere fact that they are ‘striving’ and ‘have the intention to’ (albeit through essentially a trial and error process) evolve its content to complete accuracy gives the site credibility in people’s minds perpetuating mistruths all the while this "evolutionary process" is fleshing itself out.

And as Saint Bernard of Clairvaux said, the road to hell is paved with good intentions.

The Bigger Problem
But the bigger problem to me is that in the mean time, while things are evolving and getting shaken up, anyone can write anything they darn well feel like:  Impune the reputation of an individual or an organization, slant the criteria of the content so that it favors one opinion over another, provide links to content that expands far beyond the scope of the topic and leads the reader down the editor’s agenda – all the while presenting the content as completely factual.

There have been many a person, product, or company that have had their reputations essentially RAPED by Wikipedia for long periods of time, but because no one is going to notify the impuned about the offense, the individual or company has to constantly be on the lookout for people writing mistruths about them in Wikipedia.  Is this fair?  This wouldn’t be as big a problem if Wikipedia was less of a supposed authority and was less popular, but because Wikipedia waves off all responsibility of the content onto its creators, most of the time people that have had their reputations damaged walk away from Wikipedia with nothing more than a correction and an apology.

There is NO CONSEQUENCE for people that post incorrect content on Wikipedia.

There are people that say, "Well, that’s the reader’s problem if they accept it as truth."  I completely disagree.  Just because someone accepts a mistruth or a lie doesn’t excuse another from the initial deceit in the first place.  If someone robs you and you don’t file charges, it doesn’t make the robbery "right".

"Wikis" are a different thing entirely
Wikis are databases of information that are completely separate from Wikipedia.  Wikipedia is a large form of a wiki.  Anyone can host & create their own Wiki using a server and some software.  In fact, companies like Microsoft have been doing this in some form for years:  It’s called a Support Database.

When you call into Microsoft, we store content into Clarify, our help desk application which tracks support incidents and stores the collective knowledge of the discussion and problem online so that I or anyone else at Microsoft can retrieve the content and learn from it in the future.

How is this different from Wikipedia?  Well, if I open a case and put incorrect content in it, I’m on the hook for it.  Translation:  MY JOB IS ON THE LINE.  It doesn’t matter that I had the "best of intentions"… the content is still associated with my employment and if it’s wrong, I’m held liable.  And I’d kind of like to remain employed.  Content that is questionable as opposed to fact, is significantly highlighted as such and people are ware of conjecture and subjective material rather than objective material.

In turn, ACCURATE information is often rewarded – most often with accolades or fame.  A good support technician is often well known based on the good content they publish in the support database.

This by the way is one of the reasons content on http://support.microsoft.com takes such a while to get posted.  The content has to be trimmed, rewritten, edited, filtered by legal, and then posted – and this is not an easy task.

Wikis work well if personal responsibility and integrity is maintained in the database.  Without it, it’s a giant free-for-all without consequence and there’s nothing protecting people or products from libel.

The Game Console War
Need more proof?  Take a look at the war going on on Wikipedia between PS3 fanbois, Xbox360 fanbois, and Wii fanbois.  Immature, irresponsible people have been hacking up the entries on Wikipedia to slant people toward one particular console or another.  Again, since anyone can edit the content, it’s a constant battle to correct the content, erase vandalism, and maintain order.

Wikipedia closes Wii, PS3, Sony entries
Virtual vandalism the latest weapon in the next-generation console wars.
By Emma Boyes, GameSpot UK
Posted Nov 13, 2006 3:28 pm PT

Web encyclopedia Wikipedia–which allows anyone to write or edit its entries–has locked down its pages relating to Sony and Nintendo’s next-generation consoles after continued vandalism.

A series of less-than-impartial edits over the last few weeks has led to the temporary lockdown to "protect" the entries, in the hope that the virtual vandals will lose interest by the time the pages are reopened to changes.

Users have been hijacking the site’s entries to add what Wikipedia refers to as "funny" edits. Top of the list is the Nintendo Wii–a name that pranksters seem to find especially entertaining.

READ MORE AT:  http://www.gamespot.com/news/6161547.html

Food Network has launched their Video Center player "Tyler’s Ultimate Holiday Menu Planner" which allows people to watch recipes being created with links to the text recipes.  It includes, among other things a Turducken.  Yum.

Oh yeah… and it requires Windows Media Player which is embedded into the web page.  None of that lousy quality Macromedia Flash Video for the Food Network… no sirree!

It’s beautiful.  Check it out here:  http://www.foodnetwork.com/food/video_guide/

I only go to 3 web sites for my news these days:

1. http://www.bruinblitz.com (aka http://ucla.rivals.com)
2. http://www.bruinreportonline.com (aka http://ucla.scout.com)
3. http://www.uclabruins.com (aka the Official Sports web site of UCLA)

The first 2 are pay for web sites.  They provide insider information on the Bruins that really can’t be gotten anywhere else.  And since it’s a pay for site, you know that only folks with some cash are going to be on the Premium forums, eliminating the morons that don’t have jobs and spend all day long posting babble.

But to expand my horizons, I decided to check a few others out.  It’s been several years since I’ve done that and, well, I must say there’s some real doozies out there… a few that I’ve even added to the ol’ Internet Explorer 7.0 Favorites list.

1. http://www.insomniacslounge.com/
   Who the hell is this guy?  I gotta say, he’s my kinda guy.  He’s a serious Bruin alum, that’s for certain and he’s really into Sportsbook betting… and he apparently loves photos of smokin’ hot women and isn’t afraid to post them.  In fact, the photos don’t seem to have ANYTHING TO DO with his actual blog posts.  He just… puts photos of smokin’ hot women into every post.  C’mon, you just gotta love that!
2. http://bruinsnation.com/
   If you ever want to get some perspective, this is the place to go.  This guy is the source of all hatred & loathing.  If you think you’re angry at the Bruins, you gotta check out this site.  Imagine a torrent of sheer, unadulterated anger eminating from one person:  That’s Bruinsnation. Suddenly, things won’t look so bad.
3. http://www.bruinzone.com/
   All this seems to be is a summary of links to UCLA-related articles written in major paper publications throughout Southern California, which in it of itself is somewhat useful, although I don’t give most publications – including the LA Times – much credibility.  When it comes to bias and unbalanced reporting, the Los Angeles Times is about as bad as they come.
4. http://ucla.mostvaluablenetwork.com/
   A.k.a. UCLA Hoop Scoop, this is a great blog that contains both factual and subjective content about the Basketball team.  Nice bit of content… surprised he hasn’t made it a pay-for site though.  I guess he has to bring up readership.  Back in the day, there was a site called "Bruin Hoop Report" that I used to love to read similar to this but alas its gone and dried up.